Thanks for visiting Cleaning Camera Lenses. Remember to bookmark this page Canon EF 17-40.
Canon EF 17-40
CANON 17-40 mm f/4 L USM Lens - Unboxing & Review:
Prime Lens Vs Zoom Lens – Which Is Best?
So, you’re wanting to get a new lens, but you’re not quite sure whether to buy a prime lens or a zoom lens. Both types of lenses have their advantages and disadvantages, and you want to make sure you make the right decision and get the lens which best fits your photographic needs.
In case you didn't already know, the main difference between a zoom lens and prime lens is that a zoom lens enables you to adjust your focal length within a certain range (for example 18-50mm), whereas a prime lens has a fixed focal length.
So you might be wondering what the point is of using a prime lens. Surely if you have the choice between a lens with flexibility and one with no flexibility, then surely the flexible one is the best one, isn’t it? Well, it’s not really as straightforward as that, because prime lenses do have some advantages. To begin with, they are lighter than zoom lenses because they have less moving parts. Mechanically speaking, they are simpler.
In addition to this, prime lenses usually have wider apertures. The aperture of a lens determines how much light the lens lets in at any one time. Aperture ratings are in ratios, for example 1:3.5 or 1:2.8, but usually when buying a lens you will see it shown without the 1 in front of it, for example 3.5. Lenses with lower aperture numbers are more expensive, as a lower number means a wider aperture. Having a wide aperture produces a shallow depth of field, meaning that only a small distance range is in focus. A narrow depth of field (a wide aperture) would be great for close-ups of flowers where you want the background blurred, whereas a large depth-of-field (a small aperture) would be ideal for landscape photos.
Okay, so how about the zoom lens?
Well, a zoom lens will give you a bigger range of distances to compose your image. This means that you don't need to move closer or further away from your subject to get the picture you're after. It can also be great for taking shots of wildlife, because you can zoom in without having to change your position, so you will be less likely to scare the animal away.
The best way to decide which type of lens is right for you is to ask yourself what type of photography you are going to be doing. If you are going to be photographing a scene which remains still, such as a landscape scene, then a prime lens could be a good choice. If on the other hand you want to photograph things that are moving, such as animals, people, or sports photography, then a zoom lens is a must.
So, you’re wanting to get a new lens, but you’re not quite sure whether to buy a prime lens or a zoom lens. Both types of lenses have their advantages and disadvantages, and you want to make sure you make the right decision and get the lens which best fits your photographic needs.
In case you didn't already know, the main difference between a zoom lens and prime lens is that a zoom lens enables you to adjust your focal length within a certain range (for example 18-50mm), whereas a prime lens has a fixed focal length.
So you might be wondering what the point is of using a prime lens. Surely if you have the choice between a lens with flexibility and one with no flexibility, then surely the flexible one is the best one, isn’t it? Well, it’s not really as straightforward as that, because prime lenses do have some advantages. To begin with, they are lighter than zoom lenses because they have less moving parts. Mechanically speaking, they are simpler.
In addition to this, prime lenses usually have wider apertures. The aperture of a lens determines how much light the lens lets in at any one time. Aperture ratings are in ratios, for example 1:3.5 or 1:2.8, but usually when buying a lens you will see it shown without the 1 in front of it, for example 3.5. Lenses with lower aperture numbers are more expensive, as a lower number means a wider aperture. Having a wide aperture produces a shallow depth of field, meaning that only a small distance range is in focus. A narrow depth of field (a wide aperture) would be great for close-ups of flowers where you want the background blurred, whereas a large depth-of-field (a small aperture) would be ideal for landscape photos.
Okay, so how about the zoom lens?
Well, a zoom lens will give you a bigger range of distances to compose your image. This means that you don't need to move closer or further away from your subject to get the picture you're after. It can also be great for taking shots of wildlife, because you can zoom in without having to change your position, so you will be less likely to scare the animal away.
The best way to decide which type of lens is right for you is to ask yourself what type of photography you are going to be doing. If you are going to be photographing a scene which remains still, such as a landscape scene, then a prime lens could be a good choice. If on the other hand you want to photograph things that are moving, such as animals, people, or sports photography, then a zoom lens is a must.
It’s not always easy trying to make this kind of decision, but whatever you decide, a Canon EF 85mm or a Nikon 17-55mm 2.8 Lens are good examples of the type of lenses that will always be useful to have as part of your photography kit.
About the Author
If you are looking for a different item here are a list of related products on Cleaning Camera Lenses, please check out the following:

Frequently Asked Questions...
comparing 2 Canon lenses, L lens with f/4 or regular with f/2.8?
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Lens or Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens?
The 17-40 is a L lens but it has f/4.0 and the 17-55 is regular but has f/2.8
Which one is better? if you were me which one you would get?
here are the links
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-17-40mm-f-4.0-L-USM-Lens-Review.aspx
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-17-55mm-f-2.8-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx
Thank you.
Answer:
The EF 17-40mm is designed for full-frame Canon dslrs. On a full-frame camera, the lens is a wide-angle to near-normal lens. If you use this lens on a aps-c crop camera, the lens is no longer really wide, doesn't reach far enough into telephoto, and is just really limited in terms of usability in most circumstances.
The 17-55mm f/2.8, on the other hand, is designed for use on aps-c crop cameras such as the Rebels, 40D and 50D. Because of the crop factor of 1.6, 17 is only moderately wide, while 55 is short telephoto. Because the lens is EF-S, the lens will not work on Canon's full frame cameras such as the 5D/1D cameras.
If you own a full-frame camera and need wide-angle, get the 17-40mm. If you own a aps-c crop camera, get the 17-55mm f/2.8 for day-to-day use. It's f/2.8 rating is also a stop faster than f/4, or about double the shutter speed.




















































































